this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
943 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

88892 readers
2813 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well keep in mind gold mining is incredibly destructive, poisoning the land. The illegal mining uses a lot of mercury, the large gold mines harvest ores whereby they use cyanide or something to seperate the gold, and in the process free a bunch of arsenic and such.

Silver is better I think. Also though, gold is way overpriced it would appear, 3,000 some dollars an ounce, it was less than 100 in 2001.

The traditional value of gold is one for every 15 silver, if the ratio is off, you aren't getting great value.

But what could be the best, would be metals like platinum and pallidium, which have actual uses as catalysts in chemical processes.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did not say which hard money I use. I just said that I use a hard money.

[–] wazoobonkerbrain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago

Surveillance coin? No way.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The traditional value of gold is one for every 15 silver, if the ratio is off, you aren’t getting great value.

The traditional value of buggy whips was stable until there was no longer any demand for them.

The value of gold in Spain in the 16th century went down the shitter and there was hyperinflation of gold-based currency, because of the flood of gold looted from the Americas.

Traditional ratios are meaningless rules of thumb with no basis in fact.

There is no such thing as intrinsic value.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I disagree and think those ratios do exist, and when they are off it shows a problem brewing in the economy. It is way the fuck off now, and shit is about to crash in case you didn't realize that.

But regardless, gold sucks, silver better, as gold is overvalued now.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago

It was silver that was flooded from the Americas.