Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[D] Naive bayes (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by Accomplished_Milk514@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

hi everyone, I could not understand answer. I found 1/4 from table. answer is 1/2. thanks everyone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mofoss@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Uh not sure what Fubini's theorem is, I just use the equivalence of P(X|Y)P(Y) = P(Y|X)P(X) = P(X,Y)

[–] Terrible_Button_1763@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's not what the questions is asking. And that's not Bayes' rule. The denominator is not even calculating P(Y) under Naive Bayes.

Hmm, maybe machine learning is not just import tensorflow/pytorch/llm.

[–] mofoss@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Features are independent when conditioned on the dependent is pretty much what I know about Naive Bayes, I personally don't care for the semantics.

Also the last time I was using naive bayes was grad school 7 years ago so things are fuzzy, sorry

[–] Terrible_Button_1763@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Save it for your next submission, friend.