this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
709 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
4058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Drone strikes minimize casualties compared to the alternatives - heavier ordinance on bigger delivery systems or boots on the ground

If drone strikes upset you, your anger is misplaced if you're blaming drones. You're really against military strikes at those targets, full stop.

[–] livus@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When the targets are things like that wedding in Mali sure.

I think your argument is a bit like saying depleted uranium is better than the alternative, a nuclear bomb. When the bomb was never on the table for half the stuff depleted uranium is.

Boots on the ground or heavy ordinance were never a viable option for some of the stuff drones are used for.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Boots on the ground or heavy ordinance were never a viable option for some of the stuff drones are used for.

It was literally the standard policy prior to drones.