this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Entrepreneur
0 readers
1 users here now
Rules
- No Personal Attacks - criticism of ideas is allowed, attacking people is not.
- Self Posts Only - links can only provide supplementary material. Your post must contain enough content to have a discussion.
- No “How To Get Rich Quick” posts - This community is not about making a quick buck. Posts asking the community how to make $X, without making specific reference to a reasonable idea, are not tolerated.
- Avoid unprofessional communication - Please treat fellow entrepreneurs like respected coworkers, label conversations if NSFW and avoid deliberate provocations.
Please feel free to provide evidence-based best practices, share a micro-victory, discuss strategy and concepts with a frame work, ask for feedback, and create professional conversation. Treat every post as if you're at work and representing the best version of yourself.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The smart grants are MUCH harder than the focused/specific call grants. If you didn’t succeed in the focused grants then be prepared to really have to up the game in the open ones. To give you an idea, the acceptance rate is around 2-4% depending on the submission quality and number.. but either way it’s very tough. Then they also apply a portfolio approach, I.e. if you were the only healthcare proposal then you might get through with a comparatively weaker score (still >83-85% needed) but if there are 5 or 6 proposals you’d need to be in the top 2 assuming you still met the threshold.
There is no harm to doing it, it doesn’t preclude you from winning other grants or making other applications, but it’s notoriously difficult and specific funding calls are known to be much easier.
HTH