this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
571 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

89162 readers
4109 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't believe this at all, the way it works is not completely direct, but through productivity gains that are harder to measure.

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

Productivity here is not just speed. It’s cost to get the speed.

If a manufacturer can spend a trillion dollars and get 100000% faster throughout, their consumption model may not fit that need.

Just because marketing can go 1000% faster doesn’t mean the business is 1000% more profitable given the costs

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

From the article (And OPs title)

“there are still no signs of AI boosting productivity growth.”