LocalLLaMA

3 readers

1 users here now

Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@poweruser.forum

Why LocalLLaMa when GPT-4 exists? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by oppenbhaimer@alien.top to c/localllama@poweruser.forum

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Title says it all. Why spend so much effort finetuning and serving models locally when any closed-source model will do the same for cheaper in the long run. Is it a philosophical argument? (As in freedom vs free beer) Or are there practical cases where a local model does better.

Where I’m coming from is the requirement of a copilot, primarily for code but maybe for automating personal tasks as well, and wondering whether to put down the $20/mo for GPT4 or roll out my own personal assistant and run it locally (have an M2 max, compute wouldn’t be a huge issue)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Bright-Question-6485@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Maybe I missed it but the most important argument might have slipped which is quite simply that GPT4 looks and feels good, however if you have a clear task (anything, literally - examples are data structuring pipelines, information extraction, repairing broken data models) then a fine tuned llama model will make GPT4 look like a toddler. It’s crazy and if you don’t believe me I can only recommend to everyone to give it a try and benchmark the results. It is that much of a difference. Plus, it allows you to iron out bugs in the understanding of GPT4. There is clear limits to where prompt engineering can take you.

To be clear I am really saying that there is things GPT4 just cannot do where a fine tuned llama just gets the job done.