this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
472 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
4058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What I said was why would someone that plans to commit a crime have a license plate? Since they just have to not stop and the police can't do anything if they can't chase.

Chasing sucks, I 100% agree it's a terrible solution. But what other solution is there that can be implemented? Please come up with one so that we can actually do away with chasing. Somebody work on this problem.

You're saying, cops shouldn't chase cars. What would happen next if they can't chase cars? They already have all kinds of rules for breaking it off for safety. And they keep making more. If there was a better solution, they would be all for it. In alot of cases, backing off can decrease safety for a bit too, so they have to be careful when they stop chasing too. The lights and sirens help keep people safer around the speeding car.

It's not an easy problem, there is no easy solution. It'll keep evolving as small solutions for parts of what sucks about it are thought of.

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You say 'what would happen if they didn't chase cars?' as if it's hypothetical, but many places already do this.

So, what happens? They will turn on lights and sirens speed up a bit and make it clear the car should pull over. If it doesn't, they continue to follow it with lights and sirens. If the bad guy starts driving in a manner dangerous to the public specifically in an attempt to flee, they back off. And then radio the vehicle description to a unit further ahead. Sometimes the unit ahead is unmarked, finds it, and is able to follow at safe speed. Later try to arrest occupants when they get out or can be pinned with confidence. There are also other tools available like traffic cameras and aircraft.

Yes, this sometimes causes people to get away. But it also sometimes saves lives of random bystanders...so some places decide it as a worthwhile trade off. And no these countries aren't wastelands with Mad Max roads of death.

You are right about some situations being more dangerous not to pursue. Which is why if someone is intentionally running over people, or shooting at everyone, or some other very intense situation... the police don't back off. But for a speeding ticket, for sure backing off.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

But the US has all that too, and uses all that. The chases really only happen with non-descript stolen vehicles. Or when the occupants of the vehicle would be in more danger if the pursuit was called off than if it continued. And there is a constant analysis as to when the threat to the public outweighs the threat to the occupant.

It's not like the police are idiots or don't have access to the same or better intelligence tools. They have to call in high-speed pursuits and there is constant oversight.

I think pursuits are overall much safer than it makes it seem when you see them on TV or YouTube, because the boring ones don't make it there, but the vast, vast majority are indeed boring.