this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2026
443 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

89702 readers
4590 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
443
OccupySaaS - "They laid us off. We're rebuilding their SaaS" (occupysaas.com)
submitted 1 day ago by new_otters_raft@piefed.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I saw some discussion about this elsewhere. Here is how the project describes itself:

OccupySaaS is a protest movement in code: laid-off developers building clean-room, open-source, drop-in replacements for the SaaS giants. First up: ZeroAuthy (Auth0) and SalesCompel (Salesforce).

In 2011, Occupy Wall Street asked who the economy was really working for. In 2026 we're asking the same question about the cloud. The tools every company runs on are now toll booths — and the people who built them were shown the door.

Two towers occupied.

Identity and CRM: the two subscriptions almost every company pays for and almost nobody loves. ZeroAuthy has shipped its first release candidate, SalesCompel is still early, and both welcome contributors today.

Who's next?

Every category on this board is a monthly invoice somewhere. The movement picks the next target in public — bring a spec, a use case, or a grudge.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunspear@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

The idea has some merit, however- one of the first rules of authentication is to not do it yourself, and rely on trusted libraries (or platforms, in the case of Auth0).

Why would any company choose a no-name AI-genned rando software as their auth stack that doesn't offer any guarantees, or compensation in case of a breach, when you could instead... not do that and have a proper functioning tool with adequate support?