this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

LocalLLaMA

3 readers
1 users here now

Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@poweruser.forum
1
Why LocalLLaMa when GPT-4 exists? (alien.top)
submitted 11 months ago by oppenbhaimer@alien.top to c/localllama@poweruser.forum
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Title says it all. Why spend so much effort finetuning and serving models locally when any closed-source model will do the same for cheaper in the long run. Is it a philosophical argument? (As in freedom vs free beer) Or are there practical cases where a local model does better.

Where I’m coming from is the requirement of a copilot, primarily for code but maybe for automating personal tasks as well, and wondering whether to put down the $20/mo for GPT4 or roll out my own personal assistant and run it locally (have an M2 max, compute wouldn’t be a huge issue)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naoyao@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I was long a hold out for ChatGPT because I wasn't confident about OpenAI's handling of my personal information. I've started using Llama just a couple weeks ago, and whilst I'm happy that it can be run locally, I'm still looking forward to open source LLMs, because Llama isn't actually open source.