this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Machine Learning
1 readers
1 users here now
Community Rules:
- Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
- Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
- Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
- Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have a paper with BA/BR/BR/R but the BA guy says he's willing to up it to an accept after rebuttal and the BR guys seem like they can be flipped. The R guy seems to *like* the paper. I have no clue why he rejected since nothing in his review says anything bad. What do you guys think?
If they didn't say _anything_ bad at all, they may just have clicked the wrong button. It may actually be motivated to point this out in the message to the AC when submitting the rebuttal