this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Machine Learning

1 readers
1 users here now

Community Rules:

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] we_are_mammals@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's a new conjecture, all right. But it's clearly false.

Consider n=4. Then p=5, q=3, k=1. But 5+1 and 3+1 are not primes.

All you number theorists out there, I think your jobs are safe for the time being.

[–] newDeckardCain@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not saying its proof is true though, it just posed a conjecture. Proving it would be a whole different ballgame.

[–] The-Protomolecule@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, what is it surprise you that it can literally make something up that looks compelling. That’s all that happened here. This is far from the most interesting thing GPT can do.

[–] farox@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't know. A bit more than a year ago GPT2 was somewhere in a lab trying to learn how to tie shoelaces.

[–] AddMoreLayers@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You couldn't have chosen a worst example than tying shoes to illustrate your point

[–] farox@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Fair enough. The point still holds though. At least from the outside it seems things are fast and just accelerating.