this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Entrepreneur
0 readers
1 users here now
Rules
- No Personal Attacks - criticism of ideas is allowed, attacking people is not.
- Self Posts Only - links can only provide supplementary material. Your post must contain enough content to have a discussion.
- No “How To Get Rich Quick” posts - This community is not about making a quick buck. Posts asking the community how to make $X, without making specific reference to a reasonable idea, are not tolerated.
- Avoid unprofessional communication - Please treat fellow entrepreneurs like respected coworkers, label conversations if NSFW and avoid deliberate provocations.
Please feel free to provide evidence-based best practices, share a micro-victory, discuss strategy and concepts with a frame work, ask for feedback, and create professional conversation. Treat every post as if you're at work and representing the best version of yourself.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It’s not necessary that they would retain full control. It’s atypical but the investor could ask for a new super voting share class to be created giving them say 25 votes per share. Then the entrepreneur would keep the majority stake but lose the controlling interest. My advice: look at the term sheet Carefully! Also is your business really worth 600k given the future value of your cash flows? Make sure you get a fair deal :)
I think he is better served by hiring his own lawyer to advise him if he is given a contract drawn up the investor.
It would cost over $2k to have a lawyer review a $30k equity deal
I’m not one to get an attorney over most business matters, but selling equity is one that calls for an attorney 100% of the time.