Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[R] Robust Reinforcement Learning Is Not Safe (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by ml_dnn@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/steapp/2023/11/15/adversarial-attacks-robustness-and-generalization-in-deep-reinforcement-learning/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] currentscurrents@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Aren't these "natural attacks" (rotating or blurring the maze, etc) just distribution shifts?

They are in-distribution for us, since we've seen objects under all sorts of optical conditions. But they're out-of-distribution for the RL model, which has only ever seen this exact maze format.