this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
34 points (62.1% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
4492 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
34
New GitHub user and extension developer claims Twitch’s website has malware (github.com)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Aatube@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/5184#issuecomment-1829172308

Twitch is a dangerous website, the extension probably won't be back. They could still easily target you at any time and you are just lucky they are sending ads. After some time of using the extension twitch will react and become even more toxic.

Twitch even has a network sniffer in its source code (among other things), its so much worse than just ads, some of these experiments are basically malware/pup that no-one would install on their device willingly, these instances aren't just left over code from some library they are deliberately crafted experiments that are present in the active code path.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orhtej2@eviltoast.org 42 points 11 months ago (22 children)

The duck did I just read, some AI is attempting SEO or something?

What an absolute garbage statement devoid of any proof nor tbh technical possibility to implement.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

based on the randomly inserted code block that isn't even syntax-correct, to say nothing about how it doesn't even make sense, seems to be a tell tale sign of either 1.) AI generated or 2.) schizophrenic generated

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

hmm, which parts of it aren't syntax correct? see below, they made an extension before pulling it

[–] crystal@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

I don't see an issue in these two lines.

The only thing is that they are most likely not actually successive lines (because otherwise that code would be pretty weird).

I think that the point of the code is only to show the function names.

load more comments (19 replies)