this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
350 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Obviously not. Carbon capture uses more energy than not burning hydrocarbons and it can leak if anything goes wrong geologically. Turns out there’s a nice stable form that carbon can be kept in that won’t leak out or enter the atmosphere or break down into a greenhouse gas. It’s complex liquid and solid hydrocarbons. Making those is energy intensive which is why these people want to burn them for fuel

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It’s hard to convince people of things that their salaries rely on them not understanding