Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[R] "It's not just memorizing the training data" they said: Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models (arxiv.org)

submitted 11 months ago by wojcech@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] blimpyway@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I said they mimic understanding well enough, that wasn't a claim LLMs actually understand.

Sure training dataset limits apply,

And sure they very likely fail when the question is OOD, but figuring out the question is OOD isn't that hard, so an honest "Sorry, your question is way too OOD" answer (instead of hallucinating) shouldn't bee too difficult to implement.