this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
472 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
60
US says climate change threatens wolverines with extinction (www.aljazeera.com)
submitted 11 months ago by tree@lemmy.zip to c/climate@slrpnk.net
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The tenacious wolverine is under threat as climate change threatens to melt away mountain habitats.

The North American wolverine will receive long-delayed federal protections under a Biden administration proposal released on Wednesday in response to scientists warning that climate change will likely melt away the rare species’ snowy mountain refuges.

Across most of the United States, wolverines were wiped out by the early 1900s from unregulated trapping and poisoning campaigns. About 300 surviving animals in the contiguous US live in fragmented, isolated groups at high elevations.

In the coming decades, warming temperatures are expected to shrink the mountain snowpack wolverines rely on to dig dens where they birth and raise their young.

The decision Wednesday by the US Fish and Wildlife Service follows more than two decades of disputes over the risks of climate change, and threats to the long-term survival of the elusive species.

The animals resemble a small bear and are the world’s largest species of terrestrial weasels. They are sometimes called “mountain devils” for their ability to thrive in harsh alpine environments.

Protections were rejected under former President Donald Trump. A federal judge in 2022 ordered the administration of President Joe Biden to make a final decision this week on whether to seek protections.

read more: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/29/us-says-climate-change-threatens-wolverines-with-extinction?traffic_source=rss

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd be for it. We're invading their homes, in our current implemetation, we are bad for the environment around us.

If we can peacefully coexist with nature, then we can move north. Till then, fuck humans.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

There's a historical Native American settlement, a pueblo, near where I live that my family and I walked through a few months ago. Apparently, it has been inhabited for the last 10,000 years.

What struck me as incredibly interesting is how little space so many people required. The rooms were basically the size of a closet, even smaller in some cases. Kivas are where whole villages of hundreds of people would hang out and discuss things. They're not even that big, like the size of a a modern living room (though some could obviously be larger). A whole pueblo's living space took up the equivalent of like...one city block

Conversely, my SO and I are searching for a house...and she and her parents want us to get 1 house surrounded by like 2-3 acres. There's only me and my SO! And we're not the only ones. Given than we're in the Southwest, people generally expect to have large houses and extra land for relatively cheap prices. And it's like having neighbors is soooo bad, like seeing meeting eyes with them while you're both leaving for work would be the worst thing ever. We better pay an extra $200K for that extra land.

Americans, man...idk about humans generally, but Americans really seem to not like each other.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Well, have you met us? 😆

I really miss city life. If I could have a naturally well lit, moderately spacious apartment with everything walkable, I'd be so very happy.

The shift from NYC to California's Orange county has been dramatic in terms of my ability to get around.