this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1274 points (97.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
1007 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    1274
    Steve Balmer quotes (infosec.pub)
    submitted 11 months ago by 0x4E4F@infosec.pub to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    235 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] HardNut@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

    had a famine in the 30s during the horribly botched collectivization of agriculture

    which implies that non-collectivized agriculture was doing a good job considering the significant upswing in the 20s. After the civil war, non-collectivized farms were doing a good job.

    All in all, you’re frustratingly bad at arguing anything coherent, and it’s clear you don’t actually care about proper definitions.

    This response makes me think you didn't really read my comment very closely considering I literally explain the etymology of the word "public". Socialism is the public ownership of the means of production, and there's good reason to consider that state ownership given the history of the word and its use over time. I don't think I'm incoherent, I just think you don't understand, otherwise you'd actually address my comment instead of restating your position and implying I'm stupid for not agreeing. I honest to god do recommend taking my comment a bit more seriously and rereading it. Really try to look at what I'm telling you, and if you disagree, I'd love to see you actually point out what's wrong with my comment.

    You're never going to convince me I'm out of line here unless I can tell from your response you actually took in what I was saying, because honestly, you really didn't have to read much of what I said to generate the response you made.