this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
185 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
4429 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

An EV's pollution is recovered after 25 000km compared to an ICE.

This is including the battery and being completely powered by coal power plants.

The conversion steps for any EV is much less then any other form of fuel, because all those fuels usually convert to electricity somewhere in the line.

You just really like bringing up debunked arguments, do you?

[โ€“] Hypx@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's too bad we're not comparing BEVs to conventional ICE cars. The alternatives are even greener and don't have a paypack period.

Fuel cell cars literally are EVs. People like you are just regurgitating a lot of BEV propaganda. These arguments only work when the alternative is a conventional ICE car running on pure fossil fuels. Your understanding of transportation technology is basically trapped in the early 2000s. You think you know something, but in reality you're 20 years out of date.