this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1274 points (97.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21226 readers
89 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    You groom them from children. This is an unpopular opinion, but it's the best solution I could think of. Shamans have done the same in tribes. Some children show empathetic and leadership skills, stading behind the weak and sharing things equaly among siblings and other children. You pick those and groom them from children to take on the burden to be leaders. Yes, this is not fair, they'll never grow up to choose what they want to be, but so are so many things in life. Sacrifices have to be made for the greater good... and so many far worse things have happened in human history.

    [–] BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Under that system, all leadership would be exclusive and homogeneous, as they would all be a part of some select leadership class, not unlike the nobility class of europe. Picking people from childhood and grooming them to be leaders is no guarantee that they will be good leaders. What do we do if someone is a bad leader in this sytem?

    [–] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    You resign them from their positions because those leaders will not be the only ones in the country/world, more like a part of a council.

    I have thought about this as well... this is the best I could come up with.

    [–] BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Who chooses when and why a leader will be removed?

    [–] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    The council, the rest of the people in it.

    [–] BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    That concerns me because that creates a conflict of interest if the only people who can invite or remove people from the council are other members of said council. We see in the real world that breeds nepotism and corruption and makes non-violent policy change nearly impossible. Wouldn't it be better to allow the people to choose council members and remove them by vote when necessary?

    [–] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, I see your point of view. May be better like that... or a combo of votes maybe (the people and the council).