Technology

59402 readers

2525 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

779

The Cybertruck Is a Disappointment Even to Cybertruck Superfans / Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money (www.vice.com)

submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

241 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Cybertruck Is a Disappointment Even to Cybertruck Superfans / Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money::Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

the dangerous brake lights are more of a concern to me than the cost and range.

This thing is so far behind schedule and they’re failing at the basics.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Gotta follow code, center brake must be distinct from all other lights... Should we make a separate chmsl then? Nah, lightbar go brrrrt and FMVSS 108 can ligma.

Really though, I wouldn't mind this lighting choice as much if the lower brake lights were bigger and the c"hm"sl was actually brighter. Dedicate another 8 square inches to additional brake lighting, damn it

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can you explain it to me? I still don't get it.

[–] nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN@lemmings.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is less light during braking instead of more, or brighter.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why?

[–] nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN@lemmings.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In order to make the break light visibly stand out from the light bar that goes across the back of the car, they turn off two sections of the bar on the left and right of the centre, leaving a portion of the light bar lighted in the centre.

Normally car manufacturers treat the light bar as a running light, and they add a seperate 'third' brakelight. Clearly at Tesla they didn't want to alter the design, and this weird solution fits the wording of the government mandate. It doesn't fit the spirit, but they got away with it.

And it's ironic because in every other bit of safety, like crash protection, rollover protection. Tesla is a leader in the market, their cars are incredibly safe. Tesla really cares about you when you bought a car, they don't really care about safety in general. Sums up Musks attitude.