this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

40467 readers
552 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Surprise surprise, the largest cloud provider wants to attack the 2nd largest provider.

Stay tuned for arguments as to why new laws are totally necessary to keep a fair playing field for "everyone", that just happen to serve the most dominant provider best!

Zavery said that AWS does not pose the same anticompetitive risks as Microsoft despite having a larger share of the cloud market because AWS customers don’t face the same licensing restrictions.

AWS has their own lock-in mechanisms. AWS pushes you to use managed services and AWS-specific objects which would require massive re-architecting efforts to port any mature AWS environment over to Azure or GCP.

Of course I'm sure Amazon would respond with, "But users don't have to do that!" to which Google's statement about Azure applies equally-well:

“[once locked in, users have] no economically reasonable alternative but to use ~~Azure~~ AWS as their cloud services provider, even if they prefer the prices, quality, security, innovations, and features of rivals.”