this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
709 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
3469 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
709
PlayStation keeps reminding us why digital ownership sucks (www.theverge.com)
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
161 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kissaki@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

because rights that can be taken away on a whim are no rights at all

They're rights to temporary access. A contacted temporary right.

I agree with your main point that it's not ownership though.

[โ€“] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What you're talking about is being allowed to use something or being tolerated, that's different from having a right. A temporary right is a real right for a specified time frame, but here it would just be "until I decide you don't".