this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
767 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
337 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I held off on Windows 10 for as long as I could until Adobe, and therefore my job, required it. Now this nonsense. I hope this isn't the start of them joining on the web DRM bandwagon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TokyoMonsterTrucker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

This is seriously deserving of an antitrust investigation. An open web is essential.

*Edit: referring to Chrome and its derivatives, not Adobe. Alphabet/Google has been begging for antitrust action for years.

[–] preciouspupp@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

How would that be an antitrust issue?

[–] TokyoMonsterTrucker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Google forcing people to use its browser or pushing companies to develop exclusively for its browsers has broad antitrust implications, especially if they are using their ad clout to push wider adoption.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What does Google have to do with Adobe not supporting one specific browser not made by either company?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)