this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
1367 points (91.9% liked)

linuxmemes

20786 readers
532 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An oldie, but a goodie

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't miss the sin. The sin isn't relevant to me. You don't treat people like that. Whatever you hope to accomplish, you can accomplish without treating people like that. If someone else is being abusive, that's not license for you to be abusive in response. If a cop was abusing their power would you expect the chief of police to publicly berate and insult him, or would you expect the standards to be enforced without resorting to that?

When you abuse someone for being abusive you don't make it clear that abuse is unacceptable. In fact, you do the opposite. You establish that abuse is a part of your culture. If I was considering contributing to the kernel and saw this exchange, I'd walk away. I don't need that shit, not from Mauro, not from Linus, not from the Lord hisownself. It damages the organization long-term.

[โ€“] Windex007@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

This wasn't abuse, though.

It was a hash admonishment for the specific choices and actions that the person did that were wrong , and that the person, based on their position of authority should absolutely know to be wrong.

The confluence of factors here are what differentiates this from abuse. By calling this abuse, you're actually diminishing what actual abuse is.