this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
39 points (93.3% liked)

Canada

7218 readers
484 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 20 points 11 months ago (4 children)

If so, it seems like another argument in favour of letting most people work from home.

[–] LoamImprovement@ttrpg.network 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But it'll never happen because it's bad for rich people.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well it's bad for the rich people who own real estate (who seem to be behind the push against it), but most businesses can adapt (some sooner, some later) and probably see benefits. Big changes don't just happen overnight, though. Pressure has to be kept up for a while.

[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Specifically it's bad for rich people who own offices, but good for rich people who own businesses that don't need offices and now aren't expected to waste money on them.

The issue is that office space is leased for several years at a time, with the shortest leases being something like 5 years. It looks bad on the spread sheets when you have 3 years left on your lease, yet you're not using those offices because people want to work from home, so a lot of companies are trying to force people to go back to offices so they can get their yearly bonuses, even if it costs the company millions doing so.

load more comments (2 replies)