this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
456 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

31934 readers
712 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are reasons for data collection. But having it be opt out instead of opt in is the more evil of the two choices.

Fedora, from what I last heard, is doing the same thing for new installs. You gonna go send your pitchfork over that way too?

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. There isn't actually a reason for data collection. We know this because prior to this the telemetry wasn't present. So the things we need the drivers to do don't actually require them.

  2. Well, yeah. A lot of people were talking about switching from Fedora past few weeks.

[–] eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There definitely is a reason to collect telemetry with user consent. Not everyone will go out of their way to report on issues, or there may be features that are underdeveloped that users may use more often than they expect and they want to move resources from focusing on one aspect of the OS to another. As long as it's done with consent and is an opt-in system it's fine. I get that this not the case for this Intel one, but I'm speaking generally for development as a whole.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Well, as long as we can agree that the case in the OP is not a good example of telemetry being used....