this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
137 points (97.9% liked)

unions

1657 readers
34 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 51 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Lmao imagine saying "I can legally force you to work and if you don't it's jail time" and thinking you are in any way, shape, or form, in the right.

Anyone who thinks a worker shouldn't be able to strike can honestly fuck themselves with a dagger. Make sure to sharpen it first.

[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

I wonder how this would apply (or does apply) to e.g., hospitals. I agree that striking is a right, but still I have an issue with the thought of having an entire ICU just striking and stopping to provide health care to the people in it. The state, or whomever, is responsible for the ICU to remain in operation, so I suppose they would have to buy the services (rent) from a third-party who is not striking. Which makes sense, and yet, it rubs me the wrong way.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It would be best in the nurses case if there were sypathy strikes by unions in other sectors. Oh wouldn't you know it? Also illegal.

[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Yea illegal in the US, but not everywhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)