AnonStoleMyPants

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Please stop making Alien movies in c/movies@lemm.ee
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nonono.

I like alien movies.

Moar please. Just not sucky ones.

Last night Organic Maps was removed from the Play Store in c/foss@beehaw.org
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Yeaaah I doubt they give a fuck about this. Just an automated system doing automated things.

Alec Baldwin's manslaughter trial over Rust shooting has been dismissed in c/movies@lemm.ee
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

No they didn't, or don't have to. I haven't been trained by my boss almost at all, separate people train me on different processes. My boss leads the team, they don't need to know all the details of everyone's job and certainly don't train everyone on everything on what they need to do.

And while the team is their responsibility and what happens in the team immediately reflects on them, that is not the case legally speaking. Internally sure, someone fucks up in the team and maybe the boss gets canned or whatever, but they are not legally responsible of the entire team.

Of course this isn't true if the person the boss hires isn't qualified to do the job and were hired because of money, or for instance if that person is way too overworked or are given inadequate tools to their job properly etc.

It begins in c/greenspace@beehaw.org
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Thanks!

I don't think I've ever eaten something like this. Maybe worth a try!

Alec Baldwin's manslaughter trial over Rust shooting has been dismissed in c/movies@lemm.ee
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Now, if the training was the problem, then it is negligence of the person in charge of team (or whomever gives the ok for them to work in that job) and they should be held accountable. But not their boss(es) too.

Climate change could return us to the pre-antibiotic era in c/climate@slrpnk.net
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not just meat industry but to everyone even with a slight cold because doctors feel like they have to "do something" or the patient is unhappy and complains.

It begins in c/greenspace@beehaw.org
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yup same here, starting to get massive zucchinis and no idea what to do with them lmao.

Gotta figure something or give them to neighbours.

Alec Baldwin's manslaughter trial over Rust shooting has been dismissed in c/movies@lemm.ee
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

So wait. If I own a factory for instance and I am the CEO or owner or whatnot. I hire few people who are responsible in some parts of the factory. They hire people to do the everyday stuff, maintenance, IT, whatnot.

Then someone torches the factory down during night shift and someone dies. They go to jail. And everyone above them go to jail because they happened to hire that person?

Nah fuck that.

Sure, if you don't vet the people well enough and let someone who is not qualified do something and an accident happens and whatnot. Then the person who hired the person should be held accountable.

Scientists call for 'major initiative' to study whether geoengineering should be used on glaciers in c/climate@slrpnk.net
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah and we kinda need to start doing it soon. Because it might become a thing we have to do, and I'd rather we know how to do it and not just wing it.

World hits 12 straight months of record-high temperatures — but as warming continues, it'll be "remembered as comparatively cold" in c/climate@slrpnk.net
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 months ago

Same as with anything that needs a collection of people to make a change. You just do it so that more people start to do it and at some point that number of people is large enough that it makes a dent. Or more likely, large enough that companies realise potential for profit and invest more into it, making a positive feedback loop.

World hits 12 straight months of record-high temperatures — but as warming continues, it'll be "remembered as comparatively cold" in c/climate@slrpnk.net
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

I think you mean most of the world.

Goldman Sachs: AI Is Overhyped, Wildly Expensive, and Unreliable in c/technology@beehaw.org
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the rest of the world has been hyping AI since the start, no? Most companies are not run by billionaires.

0
Anyone think that manual "pouring techniques" are mostly fluff? (sopuli.xyz)
 

If you search YouTube for V60 brewing videos and guides you'll find about three billion different ones. Some with agitation, some without; pouring fast, in the middle, making circles; 40-60 or 30-70 or whatnot.

I always think to myself that they're mostly just fluff.

It all depends on grind size and temperature. Doesn't matter how you pour (well, within limits I would think) as long as you get your temps and grind right for the pouring technique you've chosen.

Admittedly, I haven't tried a ton of different ones, maybe three or four. But this is the feeling what I've got.

Maybe there are some edge cases, like Ethiopian coffees being more prone to clogging the filter so less agitation might be a good idea.

48
BTRFS and moving /home to subvolume, in need of a sanity check. (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml
10 comments fedilink
 

So I installed Debian 12 with btrfs and apparently it only uses a single subvolume rootfs. I would like to have my /home in a separate subvolume (and possibly /var too I guess) and with a flat subvolume structure. I started figuring out on how to do it and I feel like I'm not entirely sure yet so I need a sanity check.

Lots of comments online seem to use something like this method:

cd /
mv /home /home_old
btrfs subvolume create home
cp -a --reflink=always  /home_old/* /home/

But this would NOT create a flat subvolume structure, right? And you woul NOT need to modify fstab as the /home would be automatically mounted because it resides under rootfs actually because / is rootfs and not its parent?

If I want to actually have a flat structure, then I would first need to mount the actual parent subvolume (subvolumeid=5), cd into it, then create the home subvolume, copy everything from the current home directory into there, unmount, modify fstab to mount home, and delete the old stuff and reboot I guess.

Soo something like this:

mkdir /mnt/tmp
    Make a folder for mount
mount -o subvolid=5 /dev/sdXX /mnt/tmp/
    Mount the actual parent subvolume
cd /mnt/tmp/
    Here 'ls -a' would output 'rootfs' if I understood correctly
btrfs subvolume create home
    Create new subvolume, now being sibling of 'rootfs'
cp -a --reflink=always  /home/* /mnt/tmp/home/
    Copy old /home
umount /mnt/tmp/
    Don't need it anymore

Then go to fstab, and do something like

...
UUID=  / btrfs  subvol=rootfs bunch_of_options_and_stuff
...
-> change into
...
UUID=  / btrfs  subvol=rootfs bunch_of_options_and_stuff
UUID=  /home btrfs  subvol=home bunch_of_options_and_stuff
...

Then just rm -rf /home/* (or just move to keep it as backup if something is fucked up) and reboot?

Does this sound about right?

Edit:

Everything went smoothly. Well just don't fuck up fstab like I did. Decided not to make /var into a subvolume because not sure if you can do it the same way, thinking that logs etc are being written all the time so the gap between me copying everything to the subvolume, and eventually booting might make weird things but dunno. Also added compress=zstd into fstab mount options to reduce writes on the ssd.

view more: next ›