this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1167 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

61227 readers
5549 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Weren't adblocker-blockers judged going against gdpr?

[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Could you provide more info? On what grounds?

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

IIRC it was one lower court case in Germany... That's so many asterisk attached as to be meaningless, even if that judgement isn't struck down or amended (unlikely), that still only applies to Germany (or was it one state within Germany?).

The way the EU works is that it mandates each sovereign country to implement the mandate into their national laws, so jurisprudence in Germany doesn't mean anything at all anywhere else.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

To discern if an add blocker is in use you are processing information not essential to your service.

You could, eg. Not start the stream until the add is over if it wasn't blocked without violating this. In the end whether or not the user uses an add blocker is not relevant to your ability to stream a video.

[–] ZickZack@fedia.io -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Basically the stuff they need to detect whether ads are actually shown needs information of the device state that are generally not available according to Article 5(3) ePR.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

The e-privacy directive is not a thing yet.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It was some low effort attempt talking about "code that I do not like running on my PC" or something like that, words like "malware" were thrown around. Basically if detecting adblocks is illegal so should be any JavaScript code.