this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
29 points (73.8% liked)
Astronomy
4030 readers
323 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
has the definition of “no longer transmitting” changed recently?
I mean, i’m not a scientist, is that not transmitting. flipping click bait titles.
Title is "no longer transmitting data." If it's repeating a pattern, then data is no longer being transmitted.
Unreadable data is still data.
Is mayonnaise data?
It is made of lots of little bytes of mayonnaise.
Quantum mayonnaise theory.
I'm a fan of the many jars interpretation
Yes.
It's not unreadable. It's not data.
If you want to be pedantic you could say it's "transmitting symbols".
If I only typed out "abaababababbaab" over and over you wouldn't call it "unreadable words." You'd say it's not words.
Omg, you can't just type "abaababababbaab" on the internet you filthy animal!