this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
69 points (93.7% liked)

Fediverse

28340 readers
214 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As you've probably heard, Threads (a fairly new social network from Facebook's parent company Meta) is testing integration with the fediverse. Depending on how you look at it, it's a great opportunity, a huge threat, or both!

Back in May and June, when Threads' first announced their plans, there were quite a few polls on Mastodon about people's reactions, most showing opinions split roughly equally. How do people feel today?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Defederating isn't going to benefit us or hurt meta, it's just gonna hurt the people who use threads.

...Good. they should move their happy asses to a normal, non-ghoul of a corporation run mastodon server, if it pains them so.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is a mastodon server. A mastodon server run by meta. So how exactly is defederation going to benefit you?

[–] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Check my edit. And it benefits me by meta can eat a bag of dicks.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

this wont cause meta to eat a bag of dicks. it doesn't actually hurt meta if you defederate with them. if they want to harvest data, they can already do that by standing up their own activitypub server and just subscribing to everything.

not everyone is as technically savvy as we are, or as aware of corporate politics as we are. as much as I think they should be, they arent, and so they use facebook and threads and twitter. I dont think we should exclude them on the sole basis of their ignorance in this particular area.

Most people don't care about that shit as much as we do. and if a social network doesn't have a good supply of normies, then it devolves into a circlejerk cesspit real quick.