this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
1004 points (97.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21273 readers
1025 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    2024 is the Year of Linux on the Desktop, at least for my boyfriend. He's running Windows 7 right now, so I'll be switching him to Ubuntu in a few days. Ubuntu was chosen because Proton is officially supported in Ubuntu.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I would support a law that requires software companies to open source software that they discontinue support on.

    That way, companies that disappear don't have their customers at risk.

    And software companies will support software for longer.

    [–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I think the problem with this is that the corpos will just keep pushing out updates that barely change anything and call the device "supported"

    [–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago

    There is sure to be some of that, but they will at least get the blame for when it goes poorly.

    They are obligated by many of their corporate and government clients to patch any security flaws and fix bugs.

    I would prefer that they don't touch what is working and just focus on fixing bugs and security issues.

    This moving feature set and release of half finished software approach is why people have hated windows so much since the windows 8 days.

    [–] moonburster@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

    This would also help a lot on a sustainability level as well