this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
689 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mercedes-Benz debuts turquoise exterior lights to indicate the car is self-driving | A visual indicator for other drivers::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

On that note, can we talk about how shit a lot of reverse lights are? In addition to indicating that you're backing up, they're also supposed to function as a sort of rear-facing headlight so you can see what your backing up towards, but their size, placement, and brightness on a lot of cars makes them pretty much useless for that in a lot of cases.

I'm not saying they need to be as bright as your regular headlights, that would be serious overkill, but they should probably be noticeably brighter than a turquoise self-driving indicator light would ever need to be.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Found Alec's Lemmy account

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Whacking on the hazard lights can be helpful when reversing, for light.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not supposed to be rear-facing headlights. You don't even have to have 2 of them (1 is acceptable as long as it's visible enough). And unlike every other light, there's no restriction on where it goes. It's almost like it was an afterthought when they were writing the regulations.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They’re not supposed to be rear-facing headlights.

Blindly backing up in the dark is how you hit/run over things. Back up lights are supposed to provide enough light so you can see where you're going.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, I will concede. I was certain I read a NHTSA interpretation denying this purpose, but the definition in FMVSS specifically states the purpose to "illuminate the road to the rear".

But, there's nothing in the regulation specifying how this is supposed to work (except the brightness of the lamp), and there's no maximum height for the mounting location like the other lamps.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Exactly, we left it mostly up to the manufacturers and they've kind of abused that freedom and made them kind of shit for their intended purpose.

Now in the modern era, with backup cameras being standard equipment on new cars, you can maybe make an argument for them being a little redundant since most if not all backup cameras have some night vision capabilities, but a little redundancy isn't a bad thing, if your camera gets fucked up you still probably want to see where you're going when you're backing out of your driveway to get it fixed.