this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
288 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58143 readers
4394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Cox deletes ‘Active Listening’ ad pitch after boasting that it eavesdrops though our phones::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] piecat@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Something that can be done easily and may be done in the future, if it hasn't been discovered yet

Clandestine methods have been known since the 2000s. We know they're scummy and want our data. Why does this seem too crazy?

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Because it would result in a scandal and it seems easily discoverable (by professional investigators/engineers). I don't know. It's likely done on a small, targeted, scale, but can't imagine this rolled out on a large scale. Too little gain for the potential lashback, quite some factors need to be right, too.

[–] willis936@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The economics aren't there. A cellular chip and a subscription will not pay for the private conversations of a random house.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You could be right, but I'm not alleging they would use cell.

Presumably the smart appliance already has wireless capabilities like WiFi/BLE. And then it's just a software exercise on how to code an interface between devices of the same manufacturer.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago
  • the processing costs.
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)