Technology

59446 readers

4651 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

140

Why Masimo thought it could take on Apple (www.theverge.com)

submitted 10 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

• Medical device maker Masimo is confident it can win its legal battle against Apple over a feature on the Apple Watch, citing previous victories against True Wearables, a startup run by a former Apple executive.

• Masimo alleges that Apple couldn't have developed certain watch technologies without the help of Marcelo Lamego, who previously worked at both Masimo and Apple.

• Masimo CEO Joe Kiani accuses Apple of a deliberate infringement of intellectual property, resulting in an import ban on certain Apple Watch models, which has been temporarily paused pending further review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Do you have the right to license your Fediverse comments like this?

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wait, their comment was removed because they tried to copyright it? I’ve seen some bonkers things online in my day, but legally protecting your brain fart on Lemmy is a new one.

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

their comment was removed

Hah, didn’t see that coming.

legally protecting your brain fart on Lemmy is a new one

It does feel a little “sovereign citizen”-y, but I’m guessing based on the general sentiment around here that they want to discourage scraping Lemmy for LLM training data. It’s an… interesting… tactic though, as I would imagine most instances give themselves exclusive control over content licensing. I’m kind of curious how copyright would be applied in a federated network, though: would instances apply a license to incoming data, leaving other instances with the responsibility of defederating from them if they don’t agree with the license, or would the instance apply a license to outgoing data, forcing other instances to either comply or defederate?

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If it's a creative work then you get the Copyright on it, and can release it as you like. The work must meet a required level of creativity to qualify.

If people want to try and license their posts, why would instance owner care?

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I’m not questioning that so much as… can’t instances force you to license your content to them in the same way Reddit does, potentially one that is incompatible with the NC and SA designations?

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I don't recall agreeing to terms like that but at the end of the day they don't have to host any posts. If I thought they banned posting works with our choice of license that would be a red flag for me.

Sadly it seems licenses can be ignored when used for machine learning, it's only if they end up reposting copyrighted material rather exactly.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Roses are in, violets are out, perhaps this is such creative, but I have much doubt.

Work by tabular. License: CC BY-SA 4.0