this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
93 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
3090 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Camera Companies Fight AI-Generated Images With 'Verify' Watermark Tech::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Great, DRM on my personal photos. Next they're going to charge a subscription to view my own goddamn vacation pictures

Fuck this timeline. I want to get off Mr. Bones Wild Ride.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not DRM. It's like EXIF metadata. You can strip it anytime you want, and it will often get stripped in practice even if you don't want (e.g. screenshots, naive conversions, metadata-stripping upload services, etc.). It's entirely optional and does not require any new software to view the images, only to view and manipulate the metadata.

On its own, it doesn't tell you much about the image except that specific people/organizations edited and approved it, with specific tools. If you don't trust those people/orgs, then you shouldn't trust the photo. I mean, even if it says it came straight from a Nikon camera...so what? People can lie with cameras, too.

I wrote a bit more about this in another thread at https://lemmy.sdf.org/comment/5812616 about a month ago, if you're interested. I haven't really played with it yet, but there's open-source software out there you can try.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You could implement it like that but I'm not convinced that's the way this will go. The only way this will have mass adoption, I'm afraid, is if the tech giants can fleece us one way or another.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think the only risk is if this somehow becomes legally mandated. I just don't see how that's possible.

Adoption has a clear path because professional photographers, journalists, and publishers have motivation to prove the authenticity of their images.

For consumers...meh. I don't enable GPS on my phone camera, and I wouldn't enable this either. I don't need to prove anything.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Profitability, not user interest, is the deciding factor. We'll see how it plays out. I don't think this one will last