this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
375 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

58143 readers
5643 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Letting people twerk but not letting implied nudity indicates zero effective thought or principle on these actions.

Absolutely incompetent morons.

[–] tuxtey@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Twerking is just aggressive ass dancing bro. The real danger is the potential of a possible idea or hint that someone is probably naked. And in order to prevent this, I here by recommend every streamer wears skin tight body suits. So we know for sure they aren't naked.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com -3 points 8 months ago

Intellectual dishonesty seems to be a specialty online.

It's sexual innuendo and very blatant at that.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One thing is easier to define than another.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Twerking is mimicking cock riding as a form of dance.

I personally don't care, the only thing I'm irritated with is their very clear reactionary responses to prudish morons, complete inconsistency and lack of principled stance.

Either let it all be allowed or don't allow any of it.

This is getting to a point of extreme intellectual dishonesty.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah yeah, so in our role book we're expecting the kids to read and follow, we gotta talk about cock riding now.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If you're letting your children use twitch or any social media, you've already failed as a parent anyway so what do you care, really?

You either are raising your kids or you're letting the internet raise your kids.

If it's the latter, your opinion isn't worth shit, if it's the former then what twitch does shouldn't be a problem because you should have full control of what your children see online.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not your company to control the image of. I don't have kids. Go be a bimbo where that's accepted. Don't do that in places that cater to kids. This isn't complicated.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Twitch does not cater to children.

A few creators that happen to do childrens content does not negate the reality that justin.tv, now twitch.tv, was designed from the ground up for an 18+ audience and no amount of your intellectual dishonesty on this matter will change that reality.

Children do not have credit cards.

That immediately nullifies your completely moronic argument on this matter.

Also the fact you went for personal insults instead of debating the actual matter indicates that you are well aware that you are wrong but are continuing to pursue this unbelievably moronic take to push your worldview, not because of what's actually extant in reality.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

ROFL!! Whatever you say guy.