this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
95 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5212 readers
809 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
95
Yellow school buses are going green with a $1 billion investment | US EPA funding will allow school districts to purchase electric and low-emission buses (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So like $.34 per US citizen, not bad.

339,996,563 (2023 US pop estimate ) / (US$ 1 billion) = ~$0.34

[–] jadero@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think that all government spending should be described in per capita terms. Even better would be per taxpayer. And maybe split between individual taxpayers and businesses that takes into account actual tax paid, not just the technicality of filing.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the kind of thing we unfortunately will never see because then politicians couldn't fear-monger their base into voting against their best interests anymore. It would also make it MUCH harder for the GOP to give billionaires more tax breaks if they had to put the math in the bill to show their work.

[–] jadero@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

Everything starts with a dream! :)

[–] kevin_alt2@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I agree with your conclusion but I think you have your numerator and denominator swapped.

$1,000,000,000 / 339,996,563 citizens = ~$2.94 / citizen

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 10 months ago

Yep, thanks! Was doing it in a rush on mobile, but yeah, basically same conclusion. And it's out of money the government already took from everybody so it's not like everyone has to dig in the couch to find $3, they already gave it to the IRS ages ago.