this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
132 points (89.8% liked)

Fediverse

28299 readers
1274 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR: the article says , lemmy is confusing , too broken and kinda unusable coz servers run on whims.

While I have been active here since a month now , I have had nothing but only a positive experience on lemmy , what about you guys ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CheshireSnake@lemdit.com 82 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

While I do agree lemmy adds a layer or two of complexity compared to the simple "plug-and-play" reddit model, the article comes across as blaming all of the author's lemmy-related issues on the software rather than admitting he just doesn't understand how to use it.

Unlike Reddit’s approach of categorization using subreddits, Lemmy instances are mostly entire servers that act as catch-all versions of subreddits.

This is one example. Subreddits =/= instances. A more apt comparison would be communities, and then he can point out how communities are hosted by different instances. I mean, how did he miss that?

Another one is when he said there was no visual representation of "All" and "Local". Just one look at an instance's page shows you those options quite clearly.

Try as I might, I missed the curation and consolidation of Reddit, where content is batched up into similar topics.

Wait... What? That's kind of exactly what's happening in lemmy communities.

I may be biased, but despite lemmy's many shortcomings/growing pains I feel the author should have acquired at least a basic understanding of how all this works before writing an article that points out "problems" when there is none.

Edit: I'm on mobile so it's hard to quote every single line. But there were more than a few mistakes there.

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 25 points 1 year ago

Thats exactly what I thought , there are a bun of me issues with the author and seems like he has not even tried to get to understand lemmy,

[–] AbsolutelyNotABot@feddit.it 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean... What? That's kind of exactly what's happening in lemmy communities

Indeed I can understand this one. I'm really liking Lemmy but discoverability is pretty bad, add the fact the ranking is shit and pretty useless in suggesting interesting content and you will understand his point.

Reddit has both much more content and not only a better ranking system but also a functioning personalized algorithm, if you want to use it.

To this day, all of the non mainstream Lemmy communities I'm following it's because I've used to follow the subreddit and it migrated here.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Well Reddit also has the advantage of a lot of years fine-tuning itself.

[–] CheshireSnake@lemdit.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh definitely. There are many things that lemmy needs to work on. It's nowhere near as stable as reddit as it stands.

But the author was pointing out how reddit is better since it sorts topics by subreddits, implying that lemmy doesn't do that (which is absolutely false).

As far as discovery and amount of content, I fully agree. Reddit just has much more users than lemmy. There's no argument. Discoverability is also another aspect I'd love to be improved on in lemmy. If you're in a small/new instance, you probably won't see a ton of communities compared to a bigger one.

I'm pretty optimistic, though. I think we're just getting started.

[–] AbsolutelyNotABot@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

I think we're just getting started.

Yeah of course, we need to remember Lemmy is not even out of beta yet. But people don't really care, they try it once and if the user experience isn't at the level of competitors they simply won't use it unless there's a philosophical rationale (for example decentralization, but many don't care at all). That's why I'm so happy many developers with great UX experience like Sync are approaching the platform