this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
572 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59472 readers
5381 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 120 points 10 months ago (23 children)

Yeah no shit, and you do think I have a single goddamn bit of influence over my corporation's choice of email client??

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 89 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They can leech all the data they want from my employer. I don't give a fuck. Never use company assets for personal business as an addendum.

Just be a little more careful with your own stuff, s'all.

[–] requiem@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Depends on your sector of work. Imagine you’re a therapist or a lawyer…

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

A lot of healthcare and education institutions use Outlook as well, so I wouldn't be surprised if mental health or legal uses it too. There may be rules about what kind of client/student/patient information can be sent over email, and often there are healthcare/institution specific variants of the office suites which (are supposed to) meet regulatory requirements

I think the other comment applies regardless. Do work things on the work device/account and let the workplace handle any other concerns. When it comes time to discuss alternatives, you can make a case for something else

[–] requiem@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean it even harvests typing data and Outlook also includes calendars etc… It’s really bad.

But yes, I just suggested a re-evaluation of the use of Microsoft Outlook to my company …

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What would you get them to use instead? I use Proton personally, but I doubt many companies are using it at scale.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Use geary as a client with a private company selfhosted mailserver.

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

All of it is compatible with HIPAA.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is more than one country on this planet.

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and plenty of them use HIPPA or variants of it as a standard. There will certainly be a control mapping from any other law or standard used and 365 is going to be mostly compatible with them all.

[–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not trying to dismiss your view, but I am not aware of any country outside US using HIPPA as a standard. I'm also not an expert in this so probably mistaken. Which country are you thinking of?

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It isn't HIPAA in other countries. But it is similar enough that you can easily find white papers and crosswalks in compliance communities. The difference between HIPAA and gdpr is mostly informed sharing and where that's permissible https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/industry/blog/healthcare/2018/05/14/gdpr-implementation-hipaa-compliance-what-you-need-to-know/

Linked on that page is a PDF example. The execution and requirements are mostly the same.

[–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I see what you mean yes. Some common principles can be found outside of the US

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago
load more comments (21 replies)