this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
88 points (97.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5239 readers
375 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
88
Third of UK teenagers believe climate change exaggerated, report shows (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/climate@slrpnk.net
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A third of UK teenagers believe climate change is “exaggerated”, a report has found, as YouTube videos promoting a new kind of climate denial aimed at young people proliferate on the platform.

Previously, most climate deniers pushed the belief that climate breakdown was not happening or, if it was, that humans were not causing it. Now, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) has found that most climate denial videos on YouTube push the idea that climate solutions do not work, climate science and the climate movement are unreliable, or that the effects of global heating are beneficial or harmless.

Researchers from the CCDH gathered a dataset of text transcripts from 12,058 climate-related YouTube videos posted by 96 channels over almost six years from 1 January 2018 to 30 September 2023. They also included the results of a nationally representative survey conducted by polling company Survation which found 31% of UK respondents aged 13 to 17 agreed with the statement “Climate change and its effects are being purposefully overexaggerated”. This rose to 37% of teenagers categorised as heavy users of social media, meaning they reported using any one platform for more than four hours a day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

yea ... sighs ... I've recently been unable to shake the thought/realisation that we've just made the whole "TV will rot your brain" thing worse. There was a moment there where the internet seemed to be an improvement on TV, but the net result now, and I fear irredeemably, is that it's worse.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it's just new. We can control the internet through decentralization, kinda like the project we're on right now. Expecting any brand new tech to be perfect right out the gate is just wishful thinking though, it needs development and refinement.

TV is literally just major corporations plowing things straight into your brain, though, with very little ability to prevent it except by not watching tv.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well that’s the thing. That’s what the internet is now. And my fear is that it will stay that way for a good while as too many don’t see the point in making it something else which would just be more “boring”. But it wasn’t always this way. Putting aside the endless September, before big social, it was worth it. Now big social has captured a whole generations understanding of what it means to be online.

[–] WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Staying away from the big platforms has worked out well for me. Those are well under the control of corporate interests like TV, but I now have access to several independent journalists from across the world, the ability to fact check a topic within minutes to hours instead of days to never, and a much easier way of organizing with like minded people.

The internet is a tool. It's more full of misinformation, disinformation, useless garbage, and scams now than it was, but it's still useful if you know how to sift through it. We should be educating our youth on how to do that and identifying the list of pitfalls above to help make it even better.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

We should be educating our youth on how to do that and identifying the list of pitfalls above to help make it even better.

Hear hear!!

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I think the key point is that improvement is possible here. Something humans have within the realm of things they could do. As opposed to tv, which isn't really fixable.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"As long as money and lack of policy is involved moms credit card is ours" - Corporations On Kids 1200BC