this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30555 readers
172 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] millie@beehaw.org 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

This is nitpicky and toxic. Who cares? Bee nice.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This is nitpicky and toxic.

are we seriously calling "pointing out that the argument being made has been changed in a rhetorical sleight of hand because the original argument is completely wrong" nitpicky and toxic now? come on. this is a piss take and bordering on "let's look the other way when someone is making a false argument that aligns with what i want to be true".

[–] millie@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I feel like you should take a step back and take a look at your posts lately. You've been super combative, looking for points to cling to and attack people on. It literally looks like every angry redditor. It's a terrible look for the admin of an instance whose slogan is 'bee nice'.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

While you may not agree with the tone that Alyaza used in their reply, their response is logically and factually correct and I think it's natural for someone to be upset about someone who's being deceitful with their point (whether it's done consciously or not). Furthermore, jumping into a conversation someone else is having online to call one side pedantic or toxic isn't exactly treating them with good grace or being nice. If you wanted to diffuse, you could have asked questions or treated their response as charitably as possible before jumping to conclusions about intent.

Being nice and being civil are two different things and we do not strive to be perfectly civil around here. After all, weaponizing civility is often used by the intolerant to try and tone police others. While tolerance/intolerance isn't at play here, the same mechanisms of speech are, and its fair to attribute charitability and faith based on the conversation as it unfolds. If someone is deceitful in their response, someone responding to that bad faith with less respect is to be expected.

[–] biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dude, someone corrected your misinformation and you call them a bully?

[–] millie@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Check the username. Wasn't a reply to me.