If GamePass meant "you just get everything", I see a case for that but GamePass isn't that. It's "Here are a few Microsoft 1st party games scoring 7/10 other games cycle in and out like Netflix and you get no DLC so when you buy DLC and the game cycles out, you're out of luck"

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if you read my comment backwards or you're just agreeing with it?

Anyway, yeah, I think hte big problem gaming subs have is that unless you have first party ownership over every game in existence you can't do the Netflix thing of pretending to be selling the only expense you're ever gonna need. The way games work you engage with them too long and they cycle around too fast, so even if there is a big pool of games they offer it's just a big fat pit of FOMO and feeling bad for seeing that game you're mildly interested in come and go without actually having played it. I already have a stressful backlog without adding the pain point of monetizing my not getting around to all the games I'd like to play.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’m not sure if you read my comment backwards or you’re just agreeing with it?

I meant that no all subscription services have to be bad, just that the current ones are bad. You wrote "screw the subscription model overall".