Technology

59323 readers

4559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

789

Haier hits Home Assistant plugin dev with takedown notice (www.bleepingcomputer.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Dehydrated@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Anyone know how the plugin developer responded?

Would be dope if the response was 'Fuck you, prove it'

e. Well, the response was in the article, big disappointment "gotta take down the plugin".

It's haier's responsibility to prove damages

[–] misanthropy@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Would you risk going into massive legal debt for project you make no money from? Or would you continue to develop it for yourself and no longer post it publicly.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Again, it's the pursuers responsibility to prove damages.

Pro se and wait.

[–] misanthropy@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And the dev might have to pay a lawyer to defend himself in court while the company tries to prove their point.

Sure, he might get it back. Maybe. But he also would likely end up in debt defending himself, even if there's no real merit to the case.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

taking pro se forces the company to provide evidence and pay for lawyers while you just wait for their case to build, if they don't have a case, then there's no problem, if it gets to trial they have to prove damages, since there aren't any, that will be difficult to prove.

Taking pro se is not recommended in most situations but in this one, where the damages are entirely made up, taking pro se would not be overly tumultuous

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

From the article a screenshot shows that the project is going to be discontinued with immediate effect