this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
250 points (97.0% liked)

Linux

48379 readers
1569 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Arch, I want to get some work done not save 3 extra CPU cycles on boot.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So what you're actually saying is: you don't like Arch because you don't want to take the time to learn how to use Arch.

(Which is fine)

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's pretty much it. I don't want to use a kit/show car for commuting.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fair. Though I will say (more for others who may see this in the future), that Arch's new installer is great and definitely reduces the load on new users. That said, it's never going to be explicitly designed for people who have no Linux experience.

[–] JebanuusPisusII@szmer.info 2 points 1 year ago

Just use Arch in a Distrobox on Fedora or openSUSE. That's the best of both worlds.

[–] Elw@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly… I don’t get this. It’s a bit more work than other distros but I think that Linux users often get to a point in their Linux journey where customizing a system with defaults is more difficult than just starting from a blank slate.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Customizing all-in-one distros is a shitty uphill battle that isn't worth the trouble, so I get how Arch is worth the work there. But recommending a kit car when people are asking for a commuter just bugs me.

[–] tokyo@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is definitely not a bit more work. It’s hours and hours of reading manuals, following video guides and configuring every last detail.

This is a gross simplification

[–] Elw@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I think reality lies somewhere in the middle. Yes you have to read and yes you have to configure things but the docs are all on the wiki. There’s a point where this is easier than figuring out how to undo the defaults on, say, Ubuntu and do your own thing without official documentation on it.

[–] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t find this the case at all. I barely change the wallpaper, I’m not spending time removing a bunch of stuff I don’t use it just sits there unused. I did my time with Arch and Gentoo (before Arch existed) for years, but I would rather someone else do the work and I will use it as long as it has sane defaults, for my actual work that doesn’t care.

[–] tibi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And also, I have work to do... I don't like wasting my time tinkering with config files trying to get the optimum settings. I just want an OS that helps me do my work and gets out of the way.

All the edgelord kids boasting about using Arch are also a big turn off.

[–] forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] zagaberoo@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

Binary speed is really the least reason to use Gentoo.

There are a lot of thorny issues in package distribution that source builds completely sidestep.

Install-it-yourself plus source updates are a lot to ask, but if you can get the hang of it the benefits are pretty sweet.