this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
399 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

60056 readers
4010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla Cybertruck Owners Who Drove 10,000 Miles Say Range Is 164 To 206 Miles::Also, the charging speeds are below par, but on the flip side, the sound system is awesome and the car is “a dream to drive.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 37 points 11 months ago (6 children)

i had a geo metro that had greater range.

so confusing why this exists.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Could you convey that you were both rich AND stupid just by driving your metro?

[–] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago
[–] joemo@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok, now try to do the things that trucks are typically used for in your geo metro. Towing, transporting construction tools and materials, etc.

I'm not defending Elon because I think the truck looks dumb and is over priced, but you gotta compare apples to apples.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i had a hitch on my 96 metro. so, yeah. and a geo metro totin a tiny trailer looks a hell of a lot less silly than that silver monstrosity

i do see your point. but i think it misses main the issue here; that this isnt a good vehicle let a lone truck.

[–] joemo@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're still not comparing apples to apples. The people who actually need something like this (not this specifically because we both agree it's bad) would not be using it to tow just a small trailer. I agree the cyber truck is bad but the comparison still makes no sense.

If you believe them, Tesla says the cyber truck can have a 2500lb payload and tow 11000 lbs. That's a whole different ballgame than your geo metro which officially doesn't even have a towing capacity.

Some people actually use trucks for their intended purposes instead of a status symbol.

[–] tyrefyre@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but how long did it take you to refuel your metro? Surely it wasn’t faster than a few hours.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Or never if it gets to cold for a while.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago
[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Feels like gas mileage peaked in the early 90s. Geo metro was only 3 cyl and sipped gas. my lil 92 eclipse for over 45mpg highway, i don't even think it was rated that high.

[–] Sovereign_13@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

The early 90s was mostly a perfect storm for fuel economy.

You had the computing power available to make use of CAD and develop more aerodynamic designs with less significant overhead (i.e., doing it by hand).

EFI technology had matured and carburetors were broadly defunct, allowing more efficient operation in a broader range of environments.

The US had updated its archaic lighting regulations to allow for more aerodynamic headlight shapes.

A lot of the safety technology that adds weight to modern cars either hadn’t been developed yet or hadn’t trickled down to the average vehicle.

So you had a confluence of more efficient engines, more aerodynamic vehicles, and cars that were still small and relatively lightweight.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

well, i actually had both a '92 3ycl (suzuki engine) and then later had a 4cyl monster metro. i think that was like a 96?

just dont turn on the ac

just dont turn on the ac

Haha! Same. My eclipse was only rated 90hp from the factory, and i bought it with 150k miles. Good thing it was a stick

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I regularly get 43-46mpg highway with my 4 cylinder TLX, drops off like crazy atoms town though.

I agree that economy peaked In the 80’s-early 90’s, but if you take into account how much bigger, and heavier cars are today, we’re not that bad. Also, a lot of weight and size goes towards the superior crash safety in modern cars.