this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
70 points (89.8% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2092 readers
224 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Djinn@lemm.ee
70
Alec Baldwin indicted for involuntary manslaughter in fatal gunfire on film set (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 9 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/moviesandtv@lemm.ee
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10928093

Grand jury in New Mexico charged the actor for a shooting on Rust set that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins

Actor Alec Baldwin is facing a new involuntary manslaughter charge over the 2021 fatal shooting of a cinematographer on the set of the movie Rust.

A Santa Fe, New Mexico, grand jury indicted Baldwin on Friday, months after prosecutors had dismissed the same criminal charge against him.

During an October 2021 rehearsal on the set of Rust, a western drama, Baldwin was pointing a gun at cinematographer Halyna Hutchins when it went off, fatally striking her and wounding Joel Souza, the film’s director.

Baldwin, a co-producer and star of the film, has said he did not pull the trigger, but pulled back the hammer of the gun before it fired.

Last April, special prosecutors dismissed the involuntary manslaughter charge against Baldwin, saying the firearm might have been modified prior to the shooting and malfunctioned and that forensic analysis was warranted. But in August, prosecutors said they were considering re-filing the charges after a new analysis of the weapon was completed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm an actor, with some combat experience (99.9% swords, a couple of fake gun shots, but they were stage not film).

The idea of this happening is terrifying to me, and makes me want to never do firearms choreo. However, whether sword or firearm, if i injured someone during choreo I would know it's my fault. I am supposed to always be able to control what I'm doing and if I'm advancing and cutting at their head, even if they forgot to parry or dodge my blade shouldn't hit their head. If it does - my fault. Its drilled into us.

Having not done firearm choreo on film myself I can't speak to it, but really there should be no reason to point a live gun (even w/ blanks) at someone, you can set spikes (floor marks) to cheat the angle (make it look like you're standing opposite but you're offset) and then you a tape measure to ensure if the gun discharges nothings in the line of fire.

Actors can spend hours with an intimacy coordinator working out a kiss, or with a dialect coach working on an accent, or stunt coordinator working out falling down some stairs, it shouldn't be different for working with a deadly weapon.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

This would be the equivalent of the blade flying off the hilt of your sword and hitting someone off scene. Would that still be your fault?