this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
53 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7499 readers
82 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
53
How much does a creator's worldview influence whether you use their tech or consume their media? (beehaw.org)
submitted 9 months ago by Gaywallet@beehaw.org to c/chat@beehaw.org
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Watching the drama around kagi unfold and it has me wondering how much you take into consideration a creator's view on things like homophobia, sexism, racism, etc. when deciding to use a product. I think most of us have a bar somewhere (I would imagine very few on this website would ever consider registering on an altright platform), so where is that bar for you? What about art? Have you boycotted JKR or dropped your opinion about Picasso because they're transphobic and misogynistic respectively? Is it about the general vibe of a product or piece of media, or are you more discerning? What goes into this decision and why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Sorry, if I came off as too agro, I really hate nihilism.

It wouldn't be entirely true to say I don't do boycotts because I'm busy doing other things, a more accurate reason would be twofold:

  1. Consumer boycotts are notoriously ineffective and almost never have any results.

  2. Morally it's only harm reduction, you aren't doing good, but avoiding doing something bad, on a scale where the reduction is insignificant.

Even if the stars aligned I probably wouldn't do boycotts for those reasons, I prefer actions that bring about good results if I choose to do something.