this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
255 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5130 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
255
Why the ‘mother of all breaches’ is a wake up call for everyone (www.itpro.com)
submitted 9 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
101 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 108 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This is always the answer. "How do we solve x in y industry?" Make the fucking corpos responsible for their own asses and it will get fixed. If it costs them more money to be breached they will do everything they can to not allow that.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That, or threaten to nationalize their industry. Corporations *hate * that.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Communications should always be nationalized. It was a mistake letting corporations gatekeep phones and internet.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Infastructure should be nationalized as a whole (roads, rails, water, heating, electricity, waste disposal and so on)

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How about Intel?

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago

Obviously a typo, nice one

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 0 points 9 months ago

Internet is also communication. works great in North Korea.

[–] drahardja@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

“Externalities” are just expenses that corporations incur that have to be paid by the public.

Make externalities losses again.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It'll also screw over anyone trying to break into the market, ensuring that the big tech companies remain unchallenged indefinitely.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Disagree if you add the three different factors that I added to account for this in my original comment:

As I wrote in my edit, I think the size of fine should be dependent on:

  • size of company

  • the reasonable expectation of security (which would partially attempt to decrease fines for unfixable breaches)

  • the number of unique users affected

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think that's a great starting point for effective legislation.

I also think this could easily be twisted to become yet another artificial barrier to entry.

I don't know what to do with that knowledge...I think you're correct, but I also think there's no way to pass such a law with its spirit intact today

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 1 points 9 months ago

I’ll put the ball in your court.

I’ve completely and irreparably broken up with electoral politics in the United States ever since my tax money started being spent solely on austerity and genocide. It’s about as likely for this to be introduced as a bill as it is for a third party to win a presidential election…ie IMPOSSIBLE.